The Four Building Blocks of ABM That Actually Drive Revenue
Let’s be honest. Most ABM programs die the slow death of “looks good on slides, does nothing in Salesforce.”
There’s a reason for that — we treat ABM like a campaign tactic when it should be a revenue strategy.
I’ve seen the “ABM pilot” play out a dozen times: spin up a list of dream accounts, buy an intent tool, launch a few personalized ads, maybe a direct mail test if budgets are generous. And when those accounts don’t convert in six weeks? Leadership pulls the plug, calls it a bust, and moves on.
But here’s the real issue: ABM didn’t fail. The approach did.
So what does it look like when ABM actually drives revenue?
It starts with dropping the campaign mindset. You don’t “launch” ABM like a webinar or a seasonal promo. You commit to it the way you commit to a go-to-market strategy. You restructure how you prioritize accounts, how sales and marketing partner, and how revenue teams stay aligned over long cycles.
In this post, I’ll walk through how I think about ABM from a strategy-first lens — and the 4 objectives I focus on when building it into a revenue system that actually works.
Objective 1: Start with segmentation that actually maps to revenue
“Pick your top 100 dream accounts.”
Sounds exciting. Until you realize half of them haven’t hired in 6 months, 20% are in your pipeline already, and the rest were chosen because someone’s CEO met their VP once at a trade show.
If your segmentation doesn’t reflect how your business actually closes deals, it’s already broken.
Instead, I build account segments that reflect:
- Buying stage. Are they in-market or in a long nurture cycle?
- Revenue potential. Is this a multi-year enterprise deal or a mid-market pilot?
- Strategic value. Will this open a new vertical? Drive brand equity?
Then I align each segment to a specific motion — different channels, offers, content depth, and sales strategy. Because a dormant $500K logo shouldn’t get the same playbook as a high-intent $50K one.
The goal? Treat your account list like a pipeline forecast, not a wishlist.
Objective 2: Build the bridge between marketing signals and sales action
One of the biggest gaps in ABM programs? All signal, no follow-through.
We light up dashboards with engagement data — account X clicked, account Y visited the pricing page 4 times — but nothing actually happens.
Why? Because no one mapped what that signal means for sales, or what sales should do next.
Here’s what I’ve learned the hard way:
- Account intent without a follow-up plan is just noise.
- Sales won’t act unless the next step is clear, contextual, and worthwhile.
- “Personalized” content that doesn’t solve a buying problem won’t move the needle.
To fix this, I co-build what I call “trigger maps” — shared rules between marketing and sales that define what to do when specific account behaviors show up. Not just who owns it… but when, how, and what good looks like.
And yes, sometimes it flops. There have been times where we had good data and intent alerts and nobody followed up — or followed up with irrelevant messaging. Those misses taught me this: if you can’t make the action obvious and low-friction, it won’t get done.
Objective 3: Create content systems, not just assets
The best ABM content doesn’t feel like marketing. It feels like insight.
But creating that kind of relevance at scale? That’s where teams get stuck. So we overinvest in a one-off “microsite for our top 10 accounts” that never gets updated… or we throw PDFs into the void hoping they stick.
Here’s what actually worked for me:
- Building modular content blocks tied to persona pain points (think: value props, use cases, proof points)
- Tagging content by segment, buyer stage, and vertical so sales can find it when they need it
- Using real buyer questions to drive the editorial roadmap, not internal feature launches
This isn’t about writing more content. It’s about designing a system where the right message finds the right person at the right time — without needing a full campaign spin-up each time.
The goal is to shorten time-to-trust. If your content does that, you win.
Objective 4: Treat ABM like a revenue program, not a marketing experiment
If you report on ABM like a campaign, that’s how it’ll get resourced — and killed.
Early on, I made this mistake. I set KPIs like CTRs and MQL volume because that’s what the board was used to seeing. It looked good on paper… until it came time to renew budget. That’s when the CFO asked: “How did this actually help us close more deals?”
Now, I track ABM success like a CRO would:
- Coverage. Are we reaching the right people in the right accounts?
- Engagement depth. Are accounts showing sustained interest, not just clicks?
- Pipeline influence. Did this motion move deals forward?
- Revenue impact. Are we winning more, faster, or bigger?
It changes how execs view ABM. It’s no longer a side project — it’s a revenue engine that happens to be led by marketing.
Where do you take it from here?
If you’re reading this thinking “we’ve tried ABM but it didn’t land,” you’re not alone. I’ve been there. It’s not about starting over — it’s about realigning around the stuff that actually moves revenue.
And that starts with how you operationalize it.
In the next post, I’ll break down how to run ABM as an org-wide system — where sales, marketing, and RevOps actually row in the same direction. Not theory. Actual rituals, tools, and team structure that make it stick.
Because without operational lift, strategy’s just a slide deck.